OPPORTUNITIES: POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVEMENT
The wish list for enhancing the local area no doubt varies greatly from person to person, but most people would agree that the list probably exceeds the available resources for delivery. Opportunities do, however, exist to make a difference. In part this will be strategic planning for future investment, in part identifying quick wins achievable within a modest budget. HUDG would like to join with others to consider whether, and how, the following potential projects could be moved forward.
THE GREENING OF HASTINGS
As we begin to move forward from the Covid lock down, steps are being taken by our Local Authorities to improve safety in the public realm by encouraging more walking and cycling, in a socially distanced environment, as an alternative to public transport. Initially this looks like it will take the form of some fairly basic, somewhat mundane, widening of footpaths and the possible introduction of additional on-road “white line” cycle ways. This is all well and good as an interim measure, but it is not good enough for the long term.
Should we not take the opportunity to re-imagine how our public spaces could be altered to provide a more welcoming environment for active travel? As many will know, there is an ongoing, long term project – The Hastings Greenway – which seeks to promote largely off-road, well-landscaped walkways and cycle ways. The suggestion being made here is not an attempt to supplant that project, but to provide some complementary improvements in other areas.
Sheffield has already instigated a long term, city-wide project called “The Greening of Sheffield”, which takes a revolutionary approach to greening highways, footpaths and neglected spaces. Their approach is to use large scale planting in these areas, not only to enhance the environment but to act, where appropriate, as flood prevention measures using sustainable urban drainage techniques (SUDS).
Although Sheffield has a much larger population than Hastings and is likely to have more resources at it’s disposal, not least a highly-respected in-house urban design team, their initiative could provide a useful template for Hastings to follow. HUDG believe it is well-worth HBC and others examining in more detail.
A VISITOR CENTRE
There has been a long-standing informal debate within the community as to whether Hastings and St Leonard’s should have a visitor centre, what form it should take, and where it should be sited.
Locally, ideas have ranged from the Council sponsored initiative of a visitor centre located at Hastings Castle, to a convention come exhibition centre capable of hosting the Chess Congress and the International Piano Competition alongside trade shows and large scale music events (think a smaller O2), to the suggestion of a 1066 Centre, the latest incarnation of which is included as part of White Arkitekter’s White Rock proposals.
To take a brief look at the ideas outlined above:
At least two funding bids by HBC for the proposed Castle Visitor Centre have failed, due in part to the funder’s perception of inadequate community consultation and their concern that major construction works would irreparably damage a sensitive site.
Hastings, for good or ill, does not have sufficient mid-market hotels to provide the essential accommodation required by an all-year round conference trade, so any development predicated on a Conference Centre is likely to fail the financial modelling test.
The regular suggestion of Hastings having a 1066 Centre has popped up again as part of HBC’s proposals for the White Rock area. Unfortunately this looks like an afterthought. An insignificant building tucked away at the back of town. Unlikely to be the visitor attraction it might be in another location.
Visitor centres come in many shapes and sizes, from the small scale “interpretation” centres attached to existing attractions, such as Battle Abbey, to the more grandiose, purpose built stand-alone attractions, such as the Yorvik Centre in York. All of them require, as part of the feasibility stage, detailed specialist financial modelling to determine their long-term viability. Experience has shown, as with the White Cliffs Experience in Dover, or the National Centre for Popular Music in Sheffield, that getting it wrong can be a very expensive mistake.
So what should Hastings do? Not, we hope, press on with White Arkitekter’s tucked way offering, nor dust off the failed proposals for a Castle Visitor Centre.
Perhaps HBC should step back a few paces and look again at the basics, by consulting the local community to discover what they might want and where, before pressing on with what might be yet another failure.
Hastings has a well-established, vibrant artistic community supporting a number of festivals and events throughout the year, but compared to Folkestone we have relatively few public art works on display in the town.
Folkestone, with a population of about half that of Hastings, has a well-signposted and advertised “art trail” displaying over 70 public art works. Not only does this enhance the town for local residents, but it demonstrably attracts visitors to the town.
The question being asked here is should Hastings follow suit?
We already have some outdoor artworks, but they are too few in number and too widely scattered around town, with no proactive promotion of their existence. If the number of art works were increased, and strategically placed, they could, with those already in existence, form a town wide trail, similar to that in Folkestone, which would encourage visitors to explore beyond the Old Town, increasing the footfall and economic activity in other areas.
HUDG would like to examine the practicalities behind developing such an art trail for the town, and are looking for potential partners to do so. No funding is available as yet, but then none is needed to discuss the possibilities. Expressions of interest can be sent to HUDG via our Contact Form